I just read the thread that started about a dog attack, which quickly turned into some harsh feelings about small dogs being in the main area. This has quickly lowered my enthusiasm about bringing Sammie and Joey (our two poodle puppies) to the park, as we often bring them into the large area because Sammie has shown an interest in bigger dogs.
Perhaps it's true that it's easier for bigger dogs to trample on and be a bit too rough with smaller dogs, but the point shouldn't be excluding smaller dogs; the point should be that if small dog owner's are willing to take that chance, then it should be fully welcomed. Both my dogs have had bad experiences with dogs bigger than them, but I don't hold that against big dogs. The same could easily happen with two small dogs. If I see a group of large dogs rough-housing, I am most likely to direct Sammie to another section of the park or towards other dogs that seem to be just wandering or playing more gently.
So now I question myself ... should I no longer bring my boys in the large area? Are people silently giving me the eye and wondering why my smaller dogs are not in the empty, separate area?
So, on that note (question?), I think that improvements to the small dog area would bring alot more dogs to that area. It seems that larger dogs generally seem happy enough just having each other around, and happy with the different areas in the large area of the park, and it seems that smaller dogs need a bit more help to stay entertained. I love the idea of having an agility area, or things that they can do - a tunnel to run through, things to hide behind or to climb, etc. Perhaps a small storage bin with a few toys - I brought a rubber ball the other week and it was a hit with all the dogs.
I'd be more than happy to help with improving the small dog area, if it would mean more dogs for my two boys to play with... since it seems that they are unwanted in the larger area.
Jade
jadels@hotmail.com